When the bible says like a it is clear that a figure of speech. This revelation timeline decoded bible study shows how revelation uses symbols to explain the literal fulfillment. The book of revelation is not about the european union. The book of revelation is written in a specific literary style called apocalyptic.
Many people question this number, some see it as only a symbol of a length of time. Debating christianity and religion a debate forum for people of all persuasions. For example, when john says i saw a star fallen from heaven to earth, and he was given the key to the shaft of the bottomless pit revelation 9. The book of revelation is not a literal book, it is not even a partial literal, and no where in its pages is there any mention of this yet gods people do. The apocalypse, or revelation to john, the last book of the bible, is one of the. Conference of catholic bishops says that revelations symbolic descriptions are not to be taken as literal descriptions, nor is the symbolism meant to be pictured realistically. Harlot and beast beasts with seven heads revelation has three beasts with seven heads and 10 horns. Does it happen literally the way the words throughout the book of. The book of revelation is the final book of the new testament, and consequently is also the. And the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. The literalgrammatical method is the way we should read, and interpret, the scriptures because the book of revelation according the qualities mentioned above demands to be read this way. This summary of the book of revelation provides information about the title, authors, date of writing, chronology, theme, theology, outline, a brief overview, and the chapters of the book of revelation. Symbolic language is used because of the lack of general knowledge, and the fact that it is a personal experience which brings dream like vi.
In keeping up with the meaning of firstfruits, since the 144,000 are bought as firstfruits to god, rev 14. According to many scholars as well as many christian laypeople, the jesus we find in the book of revelation engages in a great deal of violence. A simple outline for the book of revelation is found in revelation 1. The book of revelation is not a literal book, it is not even a partial literal, and no where in its pages is there any mention of this yet gods people do there best to literalize the most spiritual book in the whole bible. Your browser does not currently recognize any of the video formats available. Prophecy when fulfilled is often what was spoken plus more that was not spoken. Eusebius criticized papias, bishop of hierapolisan earlier church father, who interpreted the book of revelation literallyby plainly and authoritatively stating. Unfortunately, the discussion of revelation 20 text has been muddled by statements such as. Is the book of revelation supposed to be taken literally.
I usually interpret other books in the bible, like the gospel, literally. Understanding the book of revelation with afolabi dollars 2 still on our foundational study of the book of revelation. Good thing, cuz i cant say i find the image of jesus as a lamb with seven horns and seven eyes very relatable. Revelation doesnt mean what many readers think it does. The serious error of the literal interpretation of revelation. This revelation timeline decoded bible study shows how revelation uses symbols to explain the literal fulfillment some people say that the apocalyptic message is only symbolic and not literal they are saying that there is no literal historical fulfillment of the prophecies. How do i distinguish the literal from the figurative. Please feel free to post passages on revelation and discuss whether or not you think they are figurative or literal. What is the catholic position on the book of revelation. Common misinterpretations about the end times book of.
The book of revelation uses symbols it explain the things that are happening today. God does not use symbols randomly, just pulling them out of the sky as if they have no meaning whatsoever. This book has been frequently referred to revelation 3. He says, the book of revelation is not hard to understand. The cause of this confusion, i believe, has been writers and commentators who have forced a figurative meaning on nearly every single part of it. The book of revelation in the new testament has the literal title in greek, the apocalypse of john. Hal lindsey, for example, is best known for his claim that the locusts of revelation 9. Literal interpretation of revelation does not deny figures of speech in the book. Some of the strangeness of apocalyptic literature may stem from the difficulty of explaining events that the observer simply did not understand, or perhaps the writers visions really were as unusual as they are described. The greek word for revelation is apocalypsis, so the title of the book is a translation of that word. In the bible he is referred to as the rose of sharon song of solomon 2.
Fathers, is the book of revelation to be interpreted by the church as literal or metaphorical. Should the book of revelation be interpreted as a literal or. One of the major reasons many of us get confused and blank in our understanding and interpretation of this book is because we see or sometimes take many of the things written in it to be literal, instead of metaphorical. There would be no reason to explain the specific numbers and times in the book of revelation any other way, other than in their plain literal sense. Apr 04, 2018 literal interpretation of revelation does not deny figures of speech in the book.
This violence reaches a zenith in chapter 19 where we find jesus going out to make war on a white horse v. The book of revelation is not a book about current events. The book of revelation in the new testament has the literal title in greek, the. And another book was opened, which is the book of life. What does the catholic church teach about the antichrist. Robert gundrys book, the church and the tribulation, was released in 1973.
The interpretation of the book revelation lamb and. The book of revelation doesnt mean what you think biblical. Understanding the book of revelation truth magazine. The numeral twelve, as used here, cannot be literal, for there. It does describe a literal event in the sense that jesus returns, the problem of evil is solved, the goodness is restored to the world, and theres a whole new heaven and new earth. Should the book of revelation be interpreted literally or. There are other examples of it in the biblefor example in parts of the book of daniel and elsewhere in the prophets. Indeed the gospel is an historical narration of what jesus said and did, so it seems logical to me to interpret it literally.
The book of revelation is notoriously difficult to understand. Revelation, on the other hand, had nearly the opposite experience. Indeed the book of revelation is like a giant jigsaw puzzle, and when we lose sight of the overall picture, we lose sight of the very key to understanding the book itself. I am a fellow servant with you and your brothers the prophets, and with those who keep the words of this book.
To attempt to find a more spiritual, moral, or eschatological meaning in this book is missing the intent of what john, through inspiration of the holy spirit, wanted to communicate. Some of the references of one thousand in the scripture are. It was a literal translation that had to comply with the warning at revelation 22. Oct 20, 2008 the book of revelation uses symbols it explain the things that are happening today. If the literal number is used for the apostles in revelation 21, then perhaps we can look at 144,000 as literal. In this view, revelation is a sort of crystal ball that gives a timeline of literal future events. The book of revelation is not apocalyptic literature. I do not understand why ministers will teach that one passage in the bible is literal, while they say that another one is figurative. Feb 27, 20 the following concerns the claim that revelation should be interpreted in a consistently literal way. If anyone adds to these things, god will add to him the plagues that are written in this book. While it may be true that all the details of every example may not be fully comprehended by any i do not know of any two commentaries that agree on every particular, i do. The following concerns the claim that revelation should be interpreted in a consistently literal way.
Three angels broadcasting network 3abn 1,590,599 views 58. They are saying that there is no literal historical fulfillment of the prophecies. While the list above is not by any means exhaustive, every chapter of the book of revelation contains symbolism. Nobody interprets the book of revelation literally, as the word is normally understood. Im not convinced that merely the word apocalupsis in rev. The book of revelation is not talking about a literal slain lamb here. The lamb here is obviously a symbol something that stands for or represents another thing. But, the story of the book of revelation is not what one might expect.
Apr 04, 20 we could continue and talk about many other passages in revelation, but i think this will be enough to start out with. Jan 15, 2018 this video explores whether or not the book of revelation should be read literally or symbolically. Some people say that the book of revelation is literal. Thus the first half of revelation 20 vision is not on earth, but rather in the spiritual world.
One of the features of that city was its wall, that rested on twelve foundations, upon which were written the names of the twelve apostles rev. The street of gold mentioned in the book of revelation is. The struggle between good and evil, christ and satan. In the first chapter, the risen and exalted christ is speaking to john. And, of course, the entire book of revelation is apocalyptic. Literal to the book of revelation or the book christian. On the other hand, you say that the 1,000 years mentioned in revelation, chapter 20, is figurative. If interpreted metaphorically, how can we as catholics believe in our blessed mothers coronation. The interpretation of the book revelation lamb and lion. Lesson 2 is the book of revelation literal or symbolic. Eusebius, bishop of caesarea, the father of church historythats who. We must not read the newspapers and try to plug what is happening today as the fulfillment of the book of revelation. Apr 17, 2018 lesson 2 is the book of revelation literal or symbolic. Jul 08, 2017 the book of revelation is an account of john opening the 7 chakras which are energy centres of the body.
However, the number 12 can logically be thought of as literal, as we see when we consider the 12 tribes of israel, the 12 apostles, and 12 gates around the temple see rev. Why do jehovahs witnesses take the number 144,000 at. Revelation is a poetic book that aims to influence and even persuade the churches to respond. Four times the author identifies himself as john 1. Some people say that the apocalyptic message is only symbolic and not literal. April 17, 2018 may 30, 2018 stephanie dawn one of the first discussions we need to have regarding bible prophecy is whether or not it should be taken literally or symbolically. And well just see like if we are to if we are to interpret the book of revelation and hyper literal way. The book of revelation seems to be completely beyond the comprehension of many. Such symbolic language is common to us from the parables, illustrations in john 10, the lords supper, etc. The book of revelation was relevant to the first century christians who heard its message. For instance, in one of your articles you argue that the days of the creation week are literal twentyfour hour days. Literal interpretation is a consistent literal interpretation of the book of revelation valid.
Irrespective if the book of revelation was intended to be taken literally, you should not take the book of revelations literally. The book of revelation often called the revelation to john, apocalypse of john, the revelation from jesus christ from its opening words, the apocalypse, the revelation, or simply revelation is the final book of the new testament, and consequently is also the final book of the christian bible. The images that are seen in the book of revelation are explained by the author. People not repenting except for the small group of faithful followers of god, and. The premillennial interpretation of revelation 20 is superior because it is literal, whereas the amillennial interpretation spiritualizes, and therefore dishonors, gods word. So, one applying literal interpretation methods will necessarily misinterpret the entire book. When a symbol is used, always look for the literal meaning behind it. To catholics, revelations end times are symbolic, not literal. There are many images found in the book of revelation and these images are explained by the writer with much detail. If not, the book of revelation becomes an untrue and hopeless book since the martyrs will told a little while longer till they were vindicated.
Mar 01, 2017 there would be no reason to explain the specific numbers and times in the book of revelation any other way, other than in their plain literal sense. May 01, 2015 22 revelations mark of the beast exposed revelations ancient discoveries duration. They were not selected pellmell by the holy spirit when he inspired book, and they do not stand for just anything we may desire. You need an understanding of the whole bible to get the correct understanding. I know that the book is highly symbolic, but is the book about the end times. I think if we crossreference these things to the old testament we will also find that they are literal. And one has to consider that if there is symbolism, then what is the nature of the reality to which it refers. Revelation the apocalyptic message is both symbolic and literal. How should you interpret the symbols seen in revelation. Aug 17, 2008 the book of revelation is written mostly in what i call synbology.
The literal number, 12, is not used in revelation 7, which never uses the term 12 tribes. Many will assign various meanings to references to a thousandyear period. Other debated books tended to have a lukewarm reception at the earliest stages, only to gain more and more acceptance over time. When the bible says like a it is clear that a figure of speech is being employed and that we should try to understand what the author meant by that figure. The book of revelation is an account of john opening the 7 chakras which are energy centres of the body. The things that happened in genesis are resolved in rev. Much debate and discord has resulted from the study of exactly who the 144,000 in revelation are.
Blessed is the one who keeps the words of prophecy in this book. Isnt the book of revelation just a fable and not literal. I have an acquaintance who presented a theory to me that the book of revelation is really just figurative language written to a specific people at that time, and was not meant to result in an expectation of jesus return, a tribulation period, or anything of the sort. So what does the book of revelation or the apocalypse say to us. June 6, 2009 volume 1, issue 17 m any consider the book of revelation the most confusing book theyve ever read.
1120 131 1542 91 1472 145 1218 7 782 1088 793 741 496 1103 8 1254 1440 574 999 1115 658 429 1605 996 1096 205 1126 987 1451 858 757 230 776 724 984 320 965